>>11222656>>11222669yall are vastly overestimating what can be reasonably done at the scale and level of detail modern lego demands.
this is the kind of lameass interiors a $400, $430 and $460 set gets you. you're criticizing a $360 set that has more usable exterior space than them and still has to feature a giant dragon and other brickbuilt creatures, of course compromises had to be made. there's zero evidence the theme is to continue, it's an ideas set for the 50th anniversary, the goal was making something that encapsulates the entire brand in a single model and they accomplished it, the fact that it manages to suggest the whole adventure is part of what makes it so great. having a single more detailed place to be the only lego dnd thing youll ever get would be so depressing. imagine if they had no intention of continuing zelda so the full extent of lego zelda representation would be a giant tree
