>>8302329>I don't think you understand pictures and drawingsFuck off with your terrible standards.
>See those shadows created by the abs? Shit's physical and deep.Nowhere near as deep as the toy's, as I said, there's a layer on skin, that's well represented on the painting.
Those shadows look like someone with 3% bodyfat, not like someone with no skins, like the figure.
> How would you sculpt that to create teh same effect in 3d?By being a good sculptor.
>That's teh reason so many statues have teh same lookAnd they also look retarded, pic related.
Does that look like the painting to you? Does steaks slapped on a belly look good?
>subscattering Do you even know what words mean? That's achieved with a degree in translucency in the plastic, even Neca has done that in the past.
Not with unnecesary texture.
