>>8784640I didn't make the thread, shizo. I don't have to be OP to be against retarded backlash.
>Why do we need supportive imagery in a /toy/ OP?Why not?
>This isn't the board for that.Sure it is. It's an image of a toy.
>You knew what this thread was gonna end up being when you made it that.Your logic boils down to:
>if I decide I don't like the OP image I WILL shitpost and derail the thread and it'll be YOUR fault for baiting me into doing it!>Trans rights is an LGBT/human rights thing right? So then that's a political issue.Peoples' lives are more important than the crotchety politicians arguing about them. If you're going to extend everything even marginally related to politicians as a political subject then I guess toys are too since big toy companies are subject to taxes and tax cuts and foreign imports are affected by trade agreements and foreign relations.
>Why bother in an already derailed thread?Ah yes. More confirmation bias.
Get mad at OP -> Derail thread -> Blame OP for making you mad -> Refuse to get back on topic because you've already derailed the thread anyway -> Repeat step 2.
I know you guys are taught by podcasters and politicians to dig your heals in and treat everything telling you how dumb you are as a conspiracy but honestly, it blows my mind that you aren't embarrassed by how childish you are.
