>>5248813Yeah, it's not a RC. And it's only listed as being able to move forward, as far as I know there's not a single piece of information or video that confirms that it can go in reverse, so don't even get your hopes on that.
You can see it moving in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTuePOcj85AIf you want to see someone switching it on, look at the video posted here
>>5247875 (they show it at 3:30)
Only thing I know other than that is that it needs 6 batteries.