>>5343041It's two pieces that are only found in G1 sets and this anon loathes G1. He doesn't need to explicitly say it. Cuck's a pretty shitty meme btw.
>>5343086>Which doesn't even exist as a Lego color. Don't just start making random bullshit up and expect anyone with a brain to know what the fuck you're talking about.It is. See pic. He's not making this shit up. An old Lego space set I had was full of ivory pieces.
> No amount of so-called "imagination" makes me think "transparent light brown" when you use the word IVORY, because 90% of the time the word is used to describe something WHITE.Ivory is an off white color. Are you really getting mad that he didn't explicitly state the ivory in question is a bit darker than normal? It's honestly not hard to come to that conclusion if you look at the pic he was talking about and notice that he didn't just say white. You were just being a lazy dick.
>All you're doing is both proving my original statement true whilst sounding like even more of a colossal idiot.Original statement: >The hell even is that? You sound like a pretentious asshole.
All your post was you insulting him when it was your fault you couldn't imagine an ivory colored piece that's also transparent, which is exactly what his words meant and was annoyed over nothing. You also called him pretentious although what he said wasn't ambiguous in the slightest. Now that he's said he wants it to be slightly darker than just ivory, all that can be said is that he could have been a bit more specific. He was maybe a bit lazy. You haven't proved anything. Anyway, why so buttmad? You didn't expect for him to insult you as well?
