>>9407426>Few art toys are even that scarce. I guess that depends on what you consider an "Art Toy". Something like
>>9407150 I would consider more a collectable than an art toy. Now something like Pic related I'd consider an art toy. Because that sculpt was done by one guy, it was painted by that one guy, the sword was cast out of resin by that guy, the necklace is one of a kind and made by that guy, and the paintjob is a one off by that guy. There's a single line of designer intent and work throughout, which to me makes it more of a piece of art than a collectable product.
Not that I really care about the label, I just like the work.
>just look like total shitThat's subjective. Personally, its not my thing, but I'm not going to go tell anyone how to spend their money or that their personal taste is wrong.
