>>6422562>Tell me the problem with the logic that a toy company would not want to make a $150 toy of a 30 year old design that is universally considered bad by everyone. LOL. holy shit...
>Awful designs dont get a $150 toy made of them 30 years after they are created.So, is that still your argument, or isn't it?
And either way, how much deeper do you want to dig that shithole you're standing in?