>>9433773>Something anyone who’s handled both figures will readily admit.How about I do is all a favor and objectively break it down for everyone in the thread so we can just be fucking done with the other anon's "BUT HE DIDN'T SAY THE NICE THINGS ABOUT MS HE'S A SHILL HE'S A SHILL" screeching.
>NA+Alt mode
+Plastic
+Paint
+Transformation (enjoyment, not complexity)
+Sculpt (better materials help make it more crisp)
Much of NA's strengths come from the materials and their recognition that collector focus or no, they still recognize it as a toy and they wanted it to be fun, and despite its failings compared to MS, it's still a remarkable feat at the scale.
>MS+Robot mode
+Articulation
+Engineering
Much of MS's strengths come from their focus on creating clean display pieces, however its transformation is not fun in the least. Impressive engineering but the amount of it packed into the tiny scale coupled with the gummy materials make tolerances and trying to shuffle pieces past each other is an awkward endeavor. It's not difficult because it's hard to understand but because it fights against what you're supposed to do. It's ultimately a better display pierce and an engineering flex than it is a toy.
Both figures are great but for different reasons and if someone was going to double dip a character from both companies, Megatron would be the one to do it with because of it.
There, are we all happy now?
