>>11254495>>11254504>>11254511imagine a world where some Lego designer has a fetish for Cheerleaders
they put one Cheerleader Girl in a set, maybe two sets if they can get away with it (the boss likes cheerleaders, let's suck-up by suggesting cheerleaders they will approve)
those sets sell well. was it because of the cheerleaders? maybe... (fetish person argues YES to encourage more Cheerleaders)
soon every set has cheerleaders, data shows kids love cheerleaders now, even if that data is false-connection (the fetish person shuts up about it, internally flipping with joy)
now substitute cheerleaders with [poop]
there is no concrete proof to connect the [fetish] to the [fetish in the set] as the data shows [fetish] sells. so it continues with the excuse of "y'all crazy... no way!" so the fetish person continues to win, impossible to spot at this point, as all sets must include [fetish] based on data
(for the record, I think poop is gross, and I wish Lego would stop already. enough)
