>>7859567>boobs, hipsWhile I do agree that hips and boobs can make the female form more attractive, I disagree that they are necessary for male sexual arousal. Hips and boobs are merely a preference.
For example, Kelly Ripa, an adult female who is built like a child female (no boobs, no hips), has been portrayed in the media as a desirable sex symbol. Most men would probably prefer a woman that has boobs and hips, but there is not a heterosexual man on Earth that would kick Kelly Ripa out of his bed simply because she has no boobs or hips.
Now, either all of the men who find the undeveloped Kelly Ripa attractive are pedophiles (unlikely), or they're simply just men who are capable of looking past a female's lack of preferable features (likely).
So if we conclude that the men who find Kelly Ripa attractive are not pedophiles and that boobs and hips are just a preference, then we must ask ourselves what is really preventing us from acknowledging our attraction to child females.
Now, you may say that child females lack the intelligence and experience to hold a meaningful conversation. Well, yes, if you're looking for a long-term relationship, then conversation is important. But if you're just looking to get off, then less conversation is a good thing.
>A little less conversation, a little more action please>All this aggravation ain't satisfactioning me>A little more bite and a little less bark>A little less fight and a little more spark>Close your mouth and open up your heart and baby satisfy me>Satisfy me babyPriscilla was just 14 years old when she met Elvis.
