>>8355531>Sorry, but there's 234098234089 Spidermans and considering how inappropriate that body is for the Ultimate Spidermans, guess what?>Easy to mistake it for an adult male Spiderman.If you actually followed modern releases you wouldn't have made that mistake. They're completely different.
>How sensitive. What's wrong with making a comparison, especially when it's a clear cut example of how not to sculpt a teenager? Stop being triggered like a little baby about toys, asspie.Yikes, did I strike a nerve? I mean you're not wrong about 4H but the way you randomly brought them up and how defensive you got about it when I called out out is a little telling. Maybe you should go talk to someone about why 4H triggers you so.
>LOL, Miles didn't even exist until after 2010. >Fucking moviecasual.My mistake, he was created the following year. Then again I was kind of being facetious and didn't LITERALLY mean 2010, I just picked some arbitrary year. And hilarious that you called me a movie casual immediately after I explained Miles was aged up because of a time skip in his actual comic. Is calling someone a movie casual your go to insult? Is kind of ironic considering half the shit you sleep about comics is either out of date or outright wrong.
>Nevermind 616 and Ultimate Peter Parkers were small for their ageAnd now he's moved the goalpost to 616 Peter is small too! Wasn't your whole argument that Miles should be smaller than Peter? Now Peter should be small too? Make up your mind dude. Also here's a pic showing the sizing of that particular mold compared to an actual 616 Peter. Stop talking about shit you know literally nothing about. It's getting embarrassing (for you).
>MAybe in your moviecasual mindCall me a movie casual all you want, it's not going to change the fact that you get your comics facts wrong constantly. Nor does it change the fact that I do own things like my ASM #1. But if it makes you feel better...
