>>6963694I don't have anything to really display right now, especially since I'm transitioning most of my work to a real office.
Most of my furniture is for my business, hence all the solid furniture that costs more, because it needs to hold a lot of stuff better.
Most of the pictures I've taken are shot in front of my printer that's in my home office, to give you an idea of how i have to share space with my work when posting stuff in my collections. OTher shelves are filled with non-toy related stuff and is pretty junky.
Check out my empty clutter in my workshop that i've outgrown. Notice the kallaxes with heavy shit ontop of it.
>>6963752>all that projectingUnlike your claim, someones are defending the detolf. poorly.
>He talks shit about detolfs then admits he uses same cheap Ikea shit. He has an unhealthy aversion to detolfs.From earlier
>There really isn't anything in the price range comparable to a Detolf. This dude is just a hater. Probably doesn't live near an Ikea and needs to feel better about not being able to get them or something.lotta butthurt coming from people who can only afford the detolf, despite the fact that there are other displays that don't cost much more that can fit way more stuff and are highly adjustable.
Also
>if that isn't his display, posting that photo proves little as that is a retarded way to set theThe reasons stated in my post is the criticism. pictures like that are just another example of how people buy multiples to poorly do a job the detolf isn't designed to be used for. Almost nothing but slipshod mods.
But please, more drama because you dislike someone criticising misused wobbly glass cabinets that are designed to be viewed 360 standing up that need to be put on other furniture because no one can see shit on the bottom.
