>>8148143>Not tiers. But that's wrong.
Again, the costs is spread out over the entirety of the products being produced from that technology (ie, the R&D). Again, you're only proving your ignorance. Hence Hasbro's way of producing toys is more apt for the processor analogy, because the cost is spread out over multiple products (and also where the new mold can then be reused)
>Are you honestly implying an i5 and an i9 perform the same and the only difference is price?No, I'm saying that your comparison is completely wrong and why you're like audiophiles. The actual comparison would be Costco brand batteries vs Duracell batteries.
>>8148152Way to take shit literally, but i guess it would go over your head since you're really trying to pretend your toy is better because it costs more, and that's why it's totally like two types of processors.
Why did you guys even bring this up anyway? did some article about them just come up? Were your minds blown away that companies do this type of shit?
It's nothing new.
Just like knowing that japanese collector companies have been ripping off collectors by overcharging for products for decades just because you guys will bend over and spread your cheeks with gusto.
