>>7362372>being a grammer nazi will totally prove your wronghue
Sorry bro, but you can't have it two ways. Either TMNT sold like shit in the US and didn't have a giant presence in toy shelves or Marvel and Mattel doesn't have a duopoly in action figures.
A duopoly doesn't exist if Playmates, Jazwares, Spinmasters, etc are all able to fill toy shelves in mass market stores along with Hasbro and Mattel products.
Also
>royalties not tied specifically to a toy brand where the ML's presence in all major US stores is larger than all other toylinesHUEHUEHUE
Again, use a little bit of critical thinking that you don't know about because of your mudhut quality education.
Hasbro has had to pay hundreds of millions of dollars over the past decade to Marvel. Mandatory, on top of the license, based on every unit of the toys they sold.
Point to any other Hasbro made Marvel toyline on the shelves that takes up more retail space than MLs, which would prove those items are fast and large volume selling toys that requires that much space dedicated toward it to meet demand and cover MINIMUM promised royalties in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
>b-b-b-b-but other people think you're wrong too!Who cares. They're idiots like you who are butthurt someone disagrees with their myopic views. In your case, you've been trying to use your mudhut knowledge of the world to say that WalMarts only carries 1-4 cases of Marvel Legends, to sell only 30 figures in three months, because you think $20 MLs are too expensive for kids to buy in the hundreds of thousands to millions.
