>>7961501>But that's literally wrong.Do you have eyes? The two faces in
>>7959896 are incredibly similar.
>Head's too skinny, making her look horsey,It literally looks to have the same proportions to the comics. You're nuts if you think otherwise.
>Can't even talk about an artist' style and do comparisons, because you know how witchy the face is too. I literally posted an example of Jim Lee Catwoman. It even has his signature on the image. And comparisons? Someone literally posted a panel from the comic next to the figure showing the faces are the same. All you've said is her face is too long.
>hahah, suuuure, but you clearly know more than me, hence purposely avoiding using actual art from the comics the figure is based on, huh? The comic art clearly proves the figure is a failure on every level.I just picked a random Jim Lee Catwoman to illustrate she isn't busty when Lee draws her. Here's more evidence supporting that fact along with showing the faces are incredibly similar.