>>8476985ICE burn
>>8476785Like the other anon said, i'm still very curious to see you build this and I like the style you're going for. I'm glad you experimented with my suggestion of a tractor-beam. Leg Godt anon!
>>8477073>disney licensefaglel
>>8477477cute! But i'd twist the split pupil eyes so they point straight up
>>8477931The scat one.
>>8478086>third party>>8478103Not sure if i see the nsx in it, but it looks really good anon
>>8478185Is your friends a computer?
(jk, i like it too)
>>8477169I think the criticism is being showing off builds that never go past the digital stage, usually visually impressive and/or using thousands of elements, but using impossible buildingtechniques or non-existent colours for pieces.
Using digital programs as a planning phase and digital way to back up your builds is completely fine. I've gone back and digitized builds that i wanted to change but also keep the possibility to roll back the design to what i had before. That and so i can order just the pieces i need when i finish my design digitally and check the wantedlist pieces in my collection first. If i have the pieces i need i'll try the connections IRL in random colours first. Then those arrive and i'll do another pass on what i mightve missed too.
>>8478670[spoiler:lit]I'm interested in this bag but can't see it online. Rest looks silly though but its for kids it's fine.[/spoiler:lit]
