>>8816366>I never said 6.3in.Nope (but you're missing the point), instead you say outright lies like
>DC Icons were decent but the lack of thigh swivels was a major drag>Superman are way too small.>Especially when comparing him to actual 1/12 scale figures like Mafex>Those two figures were terribly undersized. >At true 1/12 scale like subjectanon claims it is, Batman would need to be 6 11/64 inchesi could go on and on with all these lies and undoubtedly, you're among any of these posts making shit up to defend your hypocritical asspie nonsense.
Oh, and the point? None of these figures are perfectly 1:12, the only thing we can really hope for is approximate sizes.
Yet somehow you can overlook the Mafex Superman being He-Man sized and taller than he would be if it were truly 1:12 scale, but not anything that may be a milimeter under a true 1:12 scale. Usually going over is considered bad, yet you're taking up the opposite stance.
Again, YOU want to be pedantic about it EXCEPT when it suits your autism.
