>>11167711No, you are dumb hence my frustration, one anon claimed i comparing this
>>11167667to this
>>11167681which im not
and another one claimed i was lying about the price for
>>11167667which i wasn’t
>>11167689the other anon is claiming this is the price for quality (which its not) hence my post in the first place, quality toys were always easily affordable up until the past decade, the only helpful posts thus far have been
>>11167695and partly
>>11167655for recommending marvel legends which is still overpriced but i guess the only decent option as far as price and quality together.
