>>8033758It's not just that. "Cost-cutting" measures are pretty objectively bad. and for what? to delay the inevitable price increase?
>>8032748>>8032797Ah, neat. Yeah, I've seen those before.
I finally found the image I wanted to post with that. Web search sucks at finding these old images unless I know the artist name.
I'd also like to see them do new versions of Micromaster gestalts without the massive amount of non-integrated part-forming that's like half the gestalt. Last time I asked on TFW about them, nobody really cared, so I doubt there would be that many upset at a lack of accuracy to the original in a new version. I love them for the quirky things they are but would also appreciate their designs being appropriated into a more generic gestalt gimmick.