>>8813803>We HAVE TO GO BACK or improve what the past had.I 100% agree, but it looks like it's going to get a whole lot worse before it gets any better. Mattel needs money, and they are Ultra jelly at all the money MGA is making with Rainbow High, and OMG doll, but instead of fixing Barbie their main girl, they are just bringing back Monster High to make some side money off of Nostalgic fans in their early 20s.
>We had fucking Barbie lingerie fashion packs Things used to be so much better for both kids, and adult collectors who collected Barbie as a hobby back in the day. It's really sad that Barbie has been reduced to Bee Keeper type dolls with cheap short hair, one sided potato sack dresses with printed on detail, pixelated printed one eyes, and lips, and molded on clothing. I also miss her old Coke Bottle curvy body verses what we have now which is a shapeless stick figure body or a lard thighs thiiiiiic body type.
>>8813793Updated version.
