>>7498943Will do!
>>7498964Your builds are always a pleasure to see, and if they're also moderately sturdy - that's really nice!
>>7498984This is interesting - I rarely build vignettes. I should try it in the future. Best I've done are small bases, but they're not cut-away builds but actual fully finished bases. But small.
You also nailed how I build - Core + shell.
>>7498987When I build something I don't usually go for play features but I go for an in-universe, canonical role. No core concept no build. Aesthetics derive from that concept.
>>7499001I'm not much one for using illegal techniques as I'm quite paranoid about ruining parts by stressing them too much.
>>7499002Seems like a good balance. I also dislike those techniques.
Are you okay with your centaur doing such lewd poses on LG in front of all these strangers?!
>>7499469Are you me?
>>7499501Agreed!
>>7499604Will do!
>>7500975It makes me confused, but I do like the way it looks to some extent. I just like a more "finished" look for builds.
>>7500979I've done this before, but rarely. Usually the modules end up being really well linked together.
On the topic - I've recently manage to incorporate Classic Space like modularity in one of my builds, making it a successful attempt at branching out as a builder and not doing the same old same old routine.
Unrelated:
I am soon going to receive what was supposed to be a new, supposedly MISB 6801: Moon Buggy.
I was browsing BL and the seller mentioned how during shipping to him the box had been somewhat partially damaged with a piece or two coming out.
I have a feeling that little guy has had enough of staying in that box and wants out. I bought him and out he'll go.
Would LG like pictures and impressions on this never before (almost very common done by most youtubers for money) opening of the new (not really new) 1981 set?
