>>11205563>resulting in shitty QCThat never happened. You're one of those dumbshits who heard about the TAS figures breaking (that only affected a wave) and thought all of DCD's figures had the same problem.
Again, here's a pic of how Japanese companies enjoy gaping otaku asses by charging $15 for 80s level articulation and paint in the mid-10s, when in America you got twice as much articulation and paint for only $10.
If you look at other Japanese nerd industries, like DVD/BD anime, they do the same shit. Saying the quality is better/worse is just cope because you can't believe your asshole is so sore for no reason other than they like fucking your ass.
>>11205567Missing the point. Just because i can afford to buy a house or car doesn't mean I won't balk at paying $30 for usb-c cable. IT's ridiculous for it to cost that much when a $8 one is just as good and does the same shit.
Same applies with toys, especially when pic related looks so bad even if it was the 1990s. The toy industry has a ton of competitors making the same shit, hence /toy/'s most popular lines being budget children toys and most people don't see a reason to pay $2-5x more when the competition doesn't even offer 1.2x better features. The fact other people even make comparisons about which looks better just shows how nearly identical they really are.
If they were even 2x better (muchless 3-5x to reflect the price), there'd be no arguments.
>>11205566>more dumb nitpicking to move argument away from being a dumb weeaboo who spreads his assok.
