>>6594657see
>>6555735It's fucking understood that practically every kid everywhere is playing video games since kids started playing video games.
It's like asking what percentage of kids play toys. Fucking dumb.
Oh, and when they do actually ask in the few times that they do? You get shit like this
http://ktar.com/story/602773/study-shows-79-of-teenagers-play-video-games/https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/91-percent-of-kids-play-video-games-says-study/Vs the 99.99999999% of boys and 94% of girls in 2008.
So kids seem to have started playing fewer video games? Not growth, huh?
This is why they really don't give a shit about their demographics when it comes to talking about their stats and why they ALWAYS focus on the actual growth: 30+ year olds, (older) females, and old people. Oh, and population growth that's generally understood when talking about year to year growth.
Again, think back to when you were in school. Who the fuck didn't play video games? The sheltered weirdo kids where Supportive Progenitors Matthew and Margarete didn't even allow them to watch TV. Basically, no one.
