>>7781075>Which source material? 40K is RIDICULOUSLY inconsistent with visual portrayals of the characters. Sometimes Marines are shown as clean and bright, other times gritty and mucky, and everything in between.ahahahahah, remember the last thread where some phoneposter pretended to have an amazing computer that could see everything, and then pretended that there was no weathering on the feet because he didn't bother to pinch and zoom all the little details on the figure, by pretending a SHADED, HIGHLIGHTED, DRY BRUSHED, WASHED, and WEATHERED figure set isn't heavily detailed because he needed to defend Bandai's simplistic paint jobs?
But good on Bandai for applying some shading on their new figure, which is opposite of what you were hoping the last thread, because you really really wanted the figure to cost only $25.
>not necessarily accurate>defending inaccurate expensive figure because you're a fanboy>the best SF line we've gotten>still defending inaccurate figures because fanboy logicBut please, keep needing to lie and say everything i like is shit just because i wish a better company like Sentinel would have made it.
