>>11556365"They" (whoever is in charge of it) tried for a hot minute to give Harry Potter a new, more-cooler (?) name, so they weren't stuck with including actual guy Harry Potter in all of the things in um... Harry Potter.
'Cause if the thing is called Harry Potter, you can't NOT have Harry Potter in it. D'oh!
the fact that "Wizarding World" didn't stick makes me laugh harder. they tried "The Wizarding World of Harry Potter" and that was lame, too.