>>8047826>keep reaching with your pathetic lies to feel better about your generic looking shit. of course the blandest most generic looking shit can look like it come from any era, because they're vague as fuck.>Oh no they made Chun-Li instead of Chun-Li! REEEEEEEE!Idiot.
>Also, i buy fragile shit all the time just because it looks closer to the source than some knockoff looking durable thing that doesn't even try. That says more about your own stupidity and warped priorities than anything else. If your only defence for a shitty toy with pre-broken shoulders is "B-But it LOOKS good!" then you might just be a retard.
>now please post your frequently posted shoop of that Chun Li that you think proves your point because you've enver seen the real thing in person. overexaggerated nonsense, which is probably why you think bad QC means its universally broken.I don't even need to. Look at this shit. She looks half asleep and 50 years old.
So in conclusion you can't read, think that shonkily made garbage is acceptable as long as you like how it looks and can't understand why people might prefer a better made figure that isn't necessarily as accurate to one particular depiction in a franchise filled with hugely varied depictions of the same basic design. Three strikes, you're out.
