>>6172805>But it's the consumer's responsibility to control a company's outputNo it isn't. What the fuck are you talking about? Production is always a risk assumed by the company, not the consumer.
>by not giving them money when they are unhappy with the product.Since when does "this could be better" mean someone would rather have nothing?
>>6172809>"I want less parts re-use">WHERE'S YOUR PROOF, FAGET?!"Fucking what?
>>6172882>having standards is autistic