>>9453521all valid points, but i'll just reiterate what i said before:
>180 never before seen 'items' on display>here's a peak at one of those 'items'why would they tease a background diorama piece they don't intend to sell as an 'item on display'? my belief is it is part of a figure, and the only figures that have bases like that are figuarts zeros.
i'd love to be proven wrong, but logic dictates that this is the most likely outcome.