>>10272922Just about any naval attack aircraft of that period would have been intended to go for both ships and land targets. And most modern and modern-ish multirole fighters can carry some manner of anti ship missile. Gripen with Rb15, Japanese F-2 with the ASM-1 or ASM-2, Rafale or Super Etenard with Exocet, Su-27 or Mig-29 with the Kh-31, Tornado with Sea Eagle or Kormoran, etc... Look up your favourite and there's a decent chance someone's strapped an ASM to it. In the case of Russia and China that also goes for their heavy bombers.
Anti-submarine duty is mostly done by helicopters, and if a helicopter is serving on a ship nowadays odds are high that it can do that job. Personally I find the Ka-25 to be adorable. Funnily enough there are also some helicopter-launched anti (surface) ship missiles, like the British Sea Skua and the Soviet Kh-35.
Anti-submarine aircraft aren't completely nonexistent however, we do have things like the S-3 Viking and Fairey Gannet, and the larger maritime patrol aircraft can usually carry anti-submarine equipment too, for example the P-8 Poseidon.
Getting hold of these various ASMs will often mean you have to go to third party manufacturers for some resin. If you're lucky that means Eduard or Reskit, if God hates you it'll be, say, Air Graphics.
>>10273205Money, energy and time can be found, but space to put a 1/72 heavy bomber once done (be it a B-17 or B-52), well, that's a bit worse. Oh well, at least most of such can be found in 1/700.
