>>9278373it's not a hover tank.
A hover tank would have been better and the guns being so low would have made more sense.
>>9278348not much of a crowd controll tank if the guns are shooting at you from a 45° upward angle wehn it's a foot off the ground.
It'd fare worse at urban fighting than russian tanks in Chechnya
>>9278336YEah, i pretty much listed all the super low to the floor tanks and i did my research on the Captain America tank before saying NAY.
I like the Rage, because it makes a hell of a lot of sense if it were going against other tanks or pretty much anything. It's low to the ground and its gun elevating AND angling means it can fire over pretty much any sort of cover. It's like a better version of that Swedish Cold War tank, but with a turret.
The ultimate ambush tank.
