>>7739754>That looks pretty accurate to the source material. I fail to see the issue.see
>>7739898Check out all them panel lines, highlights, and shading. That film grain also lends to it looking like it's been around the block. Whereas the figure itself is a cheap unpainted plastic McDonalds figure; like a $15 Mattel figure instead of the $40 figure it's supposed to be.
>If you want a whethered mobile suit, buy a gunpla kit and do it yourself.I do. A kit assembled straight out of the box looks as good as an RD. So youre basically paying $30 extra to have a kit made for you.
Again, you're defending a company that cheaps out on the paint like Mattel does. A classic example of battered woman syndrome.
>>7739889>So what's your point?The point is his monitor is so shit and tiny he can't even see the weathering on the figure (like he's using a nokia phone), because he desperately needs to defend the Mattel-tier paint job on his Bandai figures. And this is so far off track, because you guys need to try nitpick everything i do and own, just to feel better about your abusive relationship with Bandai. And that just leads to classic jealousy signs, like me owning high tier speakers with the space to play them in, yet you guys who only own cheapshit built in computer speakers and can't even identify the speakers i own need to pretend mine are ok tier.
Nevermind the fact I likely own more Japanese figures than everyone here and also buy American and Hong Kong shit, hence my more than fair objective views on matters like Mattel-tier paints
>ib4 BUT YOURE SAYING MY BARELY PAINTED BANDAI FIGURES ARE THE WORST EVER AND THAT MAKES YOU RACIST!!!!I remember and own figures from when Bandai gave a shit.
