>>11293624>most people are very aware of the bullshit he spews"most people" are retards who need to create bullshit to defend a company that's actively fucking over their customers.
Case in point the retard you're replying to, who is lying because he's embarassed about the bullshit they made up even back then (see pic) and saying it didn't happen. It's nothing but constant coping, because gotta defend shitty companies.
I haven't lied and there's no reason for me to. Cool company does cool thing: praise. Bad company does shitty thing: shat on. Simple, yet you guys get super butthurt for calling a bad company bad. You guys struggle for some reason, like this retard:
>>11294052Oh, I'm sorry for being a long time 4H fan and not suddenly losing interest. I mean, I find it hard to believe that you've avoided all the quality control problems over the past decade, because literally every year that had a release has had a problem. So you've stuck around this long, despite experiencing a fuck up, so why's it hard to believe someone who's been collecting their shit since 2002(3?4?) will continue to follow their stuff?
Who wouldn't have a problem knowing that they fucked up yet ANOTHER release that even a month ago? Again, this just sounds like sociopathy, where you fail to relate.
Completely oblivious, like the retard who thinks not even 1 page of words is a lot.
>They did fix those issueThe issues caused because their lack of quality control? Literally isn't fixed, as we've seen from all their releases from last year. Like almost EVERY issue for the past decade, they would have been fixed if they did any testing. Every single one of those issues would have been caught early on.
I doubt they even have any product samples sent to them, because they're rushing shit out as fast as possible to save a few thousand dollars.
There's no reason anyone should be defending their fuck ups, unless you're a shill or a retard
