>>5365519>crippling level of cognitive dissonanceSays the guy defending poorly proportioned toys and implying seeing things is subjective, like there's no way to do direct comparisons
I like how you even think i like that Darth Vader, but it does have better proportions, even if the ugly cloth shit is bulky as fuck.
>also implying he doesn't look mopey here>>5365572>I see you everywhere posting these same complaints with the same photos over and over again. I've done it one other time. If you think everyone else who has made the complaint is samefag, you're desperate and pathetic for thinking no one else is allowed to be critical about Happy Vader.
