>>8512454>but I’d be more forgiving of the aesthetic if they were fully articulated and not quasi-statuesThey may look like Lego minifig ripoffs but their limbs are on ball joints and with the waist rotation they have an okay range of movement. But it's completely wasted on them because nobody EVER uses any of these joints to pose them. 100% of the time they're displayed in their most static pose, like in
>>8511949. Even just searching for a pic that would show an example of their articulation took me way longer than it reasonably should.
Bearbricks are a waste of design potential. Why do they have open hands designed for holding something if they don't ever come with any accessories? Why do they have the peg holes in their feet when there's nothing to plug into them? Maybe these elements carried over from Kubricks that actually did use accessories, but now they're nothing more than painful reminders that Bearbricks killed Kubrick.
