>>8028656>imports am different markethue
Shitty candy toys are imports too, but they're actually the same as the budget shit in the US. Again, you're trying to pretend that weebshit is somehow on another tier, but it's the same shit as collector toys in the US (NECA, Mezco, McFarlane, DCC, etc etc). Again, it's part of why i mocked that part about pegs.
>you can't actually point out exactly what I've retracted. Yeah, and I'm also saying you want to delete your shit and how you regret saying words you don't even understand.
I know you might be autistic, but when mocking someone, you tend to exaggerate someone's actions for comedic effect. I mean, you try to do that with me, yet don't recognize it when it's done back to you? hue. Again, you're just reaching to dismiss McFarlane Toys from the logic you used earlier.
>Name a single lie I've saidThat entire part about you saying that McFarlane's line is somehow a budget collectors line.
Maybe you aren't lying, but just hugely ignorant like weeaboos usually are. Western companies focus on other aspects, like greater amount of paint detail, which becomes costly as fuck because of the number of steps involved. See pic of how much more paint apps are usually used.
As seen with companies like DCC, not using pegs (like Figuarts) raises costs to about $30, but they increased the levels of articulation to basically where McFarlane is at right now (which is roughly the same as Figuarts and Mafex). So who knows what McFarlane would price that at, since they're a private company who isn't penny pinching like Hasbro and DC need to to keep stock holders happy (such as Hasbro doubling the price for MLs in only two years after they got the license, while also cutting articulation, paint, acccessories, comics, etc). Maybe it'd be the same price as it is now.
To get it through your thick weeaboo tumor: is Revoltech in a different market because it has more articulation than a Figuarts?
Nope. Just two different approaches.
