>>6933042Part 4
>Why do toy companies think these average licensed lines are worth $8 or more? The price for the single figures is at least 20% too high, and the robot two packs aren't worth more than $10. With these kinds of prices, the odds that people will pick up more than one or two figures is pretty slim.>The high price is a big detractor, but the poor accessories didn't help. If the robot had been more articulated OR if the figure would have fit inside better, I would have been much happier. But they still have great sculpting, and the articulation is very good for this scale.http://www.mwctoys.com/REVIEW_121901.htm>The entire show needs an overhaul in post-production, pre-production and development. As I understand it, this was originally developed as a 2D series. It's existence as a cheap CGI production is a classic example of Hollywood jumping on a new hot trend without any consideration of its audience or producing a quality product.>What more can I say? Butt-Ugly Martians is aimed at children 4 to 8 years of age and is a Mike Young Production. I feel Mike Young -- and kids 4 to 8 -- can do better. Much better.And down in the comments section
>It seems a dead giveaway that almost all the responses posted so far have been from people associated with the production of BUTT UGLY MARTIANS. This gives an impression of frantic damage-control propaganda. Publicly questioning Jerry Beck's objectivity is injudicious and petty.>The extensive merchandising effort seems to be ill-advised. The corporations involved may have hitched their wagon to a dog.https://www.awn.com/animationworld/tv-review-butt-ugly-martians 