>>7570475>JUST as bad as D-Amazing in trying to set a certain standard for photography. Google photography principles. All I’m saying is that more people should adhere to literary the most basic fundamentals of photography 101 instead of short cutting and skipping over everything and trying to call it “Articulated Comic Book Art”
>we know that's you impersonating the other poster, because who the fuck would just bring up D-Amazing like that? You don’t know shit about fuck. You know who’s mess this is? Literally pic related. I’ve pointed that out several times already. I didn’t bring up D_Amazing, he did. He hates the fact that his stuff is a carbon copy of D_Amazing but doesn’t have the same “influencer numbers” and the fact that when he posts in the photo thread people don’t like it and he can’t understand why. All of this is his mess based on the reaction in the photo thread to these two posts
>>7561135>>7562008He’s mad at this
>>7562084 and the fact that I told him that his total disregard for lighting was stupid. Shortly afterward this thread pops up.
