>>7900960sorry, didn't see the picture, but i like how you need to pretend the microprinting doesn't exist and that a nose is.... what? bigger or smaller than the McFarlane head?
Again, if you're close enough that you can see the little dots, you're as close to someone's nose to see the hair on someone's nose.
Again a camera ≠ your eyes, hence all these comparisons to tiny objects that show off a lot more detail than you normally CAN'T see, hence it reviewing so well.
>Care to point them out?Already did, but you're just ignoring their flaws that are many times larger and all located in one spot, making it easier to see, because of your preschooler belief that because if little specks are all over the place, it's more noticeable.
>SHF face printing Again, there's a difference between constrasting colors of a low res print over bare plastic and little specks that are the same color as the base color. Again, every quality publisher switched to newer literally BETTER print technology because everyone knows how low quality and cheap it is. Maybe it's still brand new in your poor mudhole, but not in first world nations.
>Making fun of your retardation aside,OH, so now you're pretending you're retarded and autistic after saying you feel the texture on your toys? I know we have other posters on /toy/ that love chewing on their toys too and other lowbrow shit, so it's too late, you obviously think /toy/ is your safe zone.
It's why there's a few other shitposters like yourself like to gang up, thinking that adds any relevance or credibility to your denials and bullshit.
That entire "contrarian" argument? Hilarious that you autists believe you make up a majority anywhere, muchless understand that term.
