>>7572887it definitely won't be called "bionicle"
which is a stupid reason to dismiss it. i'm looking forward to a version of "bionicle" that's more or less managed by a single creative figure and isn't filtered through a million different mediums and focus groups on the way to market
there was probably a version of 2003 and 2004 once that made sense before mirimax processed the climaxes into a series of incoherent setpieces like
>>7572453, or a version of the mata nui robot where the lands were organs/parts that plausibly fit together instead of being more fucking islands
