>>5286120>The term is "ad hoc".>>5286146>think anon's pointing out that you said ad-havoc rather than ad-hoc>Grammer NazisDamn it Blitzen!
>>5286120>Try and make sure you take a good few pictures to make sure you get them in focus. Also consider either stronger lighting (not a lot but they're a bit underlit) or using a slightly higher ISO on your camera (assuming you're not using a phone).Alright, like I said the shots of the flamethrower were a spur of the moment thing in relation to a thread here, so didn't put a whole lot of effort into focus.
I already knew about the lighting, but when I tried to use a "tulip" bendy lamp I had on hand, the results were way too warm...
I might go with
>>5272977 >>5272979 advice and try reflectors instead, since my father has a bad habit of buying junk and we've probably got more than a few mirrors handy.
