>>6220452>LOL, wut? I'm sorry, but they share sculpts mandatory, so you can't make this argument, especially when their size is off.no there are a lot of different sculpts. Many of them share body pieces, yes, but nearly all of them have a unique sculpt piece (still looking at the last 3 years tops). I'm not going through to name them, and you wouldn't believe me anyways, but its the truth. They reuse a lot of spidermen, but even the 2099 is the most articulate figure theyve released, with unique shoulder pieces. Batman and Superman and Flash are simply more similar than most MLs that get released.
Look at your picture, Gold's face looks retarded. The new wonderwoman looks horrible compared to the promo pics. Her face is fat, her arms are tiny, same proportion issues most of them share.
>Icons are shaped weird >How the hell is this even a criticism? What a nebulous thing to say, almost like you dont have a legit point.Many of them are disproportionate. Small arms, big legs. The abdomen pieces they use for males are too big for a chest piece.
>good ML>icons>bad MLs>Yeah, that's nice if you want to treat it as by purely quantity, but percentage wise it's>Icons >>>>>>>> Good MLs ≥ Bad MLs. Yes, equal or greater than because the percentage is SMALL.We're just going to disagree, but you can't deny that ML puts out more figures in 2-3 months than icons has EVER released. That includes obscure comic characters every wave. ML released more good figures in a year that icons has EVER, and probably ever will looking at how successful the line is.
