>>11081942It wouldn't be a Dragonborn at that point; as I said the last time we spoke, this is like tacking wings onto an Argonian from TES - you KNOW they're not supposed to have them. The name 'Dragonborn' doesn't mean they're literal dragons - it means they were created BY dragons.
Look, I know you're a disingenuous little prick - nobody here has forgotten that we had this argument with you several threads ago - but there's only so much you can argue on your side. Dragonborn are an established race from a franchise that's been around since long before you were a sperm in your dad's left nut. There's literally decades of rulebooks, novels, and videogames that have established how Dragonborn look, where they come from, and what powers they have. Hell, they even made some brief appearances in that horrible recent live-action DnD movie that came out not too long ago. Their appearance across all aspects of canon is firmly established. See pic related? This is a canon Dragonborn. Do you see any wings? No? That's because they don't have any, and never will. You don't get to have an opinion if you're going to ignore canon materials, especially when we've been shown many times over the decades what these things are supposed to look like.
