>>7642662yeah that guy, friggin beaut of a fossil. probably one of a scant handful in all of existence to be preserved so well and we may never find any others.
>>7642665Problem? I posted examples of coloration in both feathers and non feathered dinos. Or are you someone on the same tier as a flat earther? It is FINE to prefer your dinosaur's appearance without feathers, but it is NOT fine to deny the scientific fact that is the most likely appearance of certain species.
>>7642913>>7643166Hate to tell you bro, but you won't be able to tell anything. it's a typical super flattened fossil, but with near perfect skin preservation. No way to tell if it's female or male to the best of my knowledge on what the scientists figured out.
>>7643319Are you new here? incapable of following a reply chain to understand the person SPECIFICALLY requested the only two NON-feathered examples of coloration? At least the only two I am currently aware of. If you know of more, I would love to add them to my lists.
The Caihong was also the one I mentioned having the hummingbird coloration potential.
