>>6772234>Because companies are only making cheap shit no one wants to buy.Actually it's the flip, the cheap blind bag level stuff is selling very well and the market for toys under $10 is doing much better than higher end markets. The only exceptions are Hollywood film busters like Marvel's and to a lesser extent Star Wars, but as we saw with TLJ their sales are tied to the films over all success. Without the films the shrink pretty fast
>You ignore compnies actually making profits like spin master Where did I do that? I out right stated in
>>6772221 I out right said "while they climb some" that shows I'm ignoring nothing. Also it's funny you bring up Spin Masters considering this is their newer offerings. Small inexpensive toilet humor collectables with blindbags style traits.
>or lego.http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lego-cuts-20170905-story.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/09/05/lego-sales-crumble-children-turn-away-building-bricks/Lego has some serious ebb and flow over the years more so since Mega is cheaper.
