>>6530221Nah, dude.
All you've done is shift your argument, constantly changing it in response to being proven wrong, saying it isn't correct, and when being corrected it's suddenly about something else.
Now that the design is proven to be based on wally west's comic design, which according to other posters was a combination of totally different costumes, it's now there's a squabble over vague unspecified detail.
I like how you dropped the superman angle too.