>>6947224>I don't see anything in there at all that says they feel guilt or remorse. ....
Well, I'm sad, because you utterly fail at understanding a joke and still take it literally even after laughing at you and explain it.
>Please point to your comment where you asked why cat owners love their cats.Or maybe you're just AI, since you don't understand the many ways a human can pose a question.
>https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/96996/ask-question-without-using-in-it>>6947222>You can dislike the answers how much as you wantWhat answers? Instead people try to poke at my logic, by asking how dolphins can show complex emotions without facial expressions... which really has nothing to do with anything, because some guy doesn't understand context.
It's anthropomorphizing, which I'm against, hence me mocking cats by anthropomorphising it extremely. It's.. fuck, man, do i really need to explain this shit? Autism to the extreme because such literalism.
Most everyone kept on saying I dont understand because I don't have pets, yet once i told how i spent my childhood with my cousins, then it just switched to other shit.
It's not answers, just exclamations of how i don't understand without answers to the contrary.
Only one guy tried to explain, but he's a robot and doesn't have anything to back his claims. His explanation that cats weren't bred as hard as dog does nothing but expound on my point that cats are pretty shit at relating with humans... ignoring that wolves also complex before and whatever cats were before domestication weren't. BAsically, you can't turn a turd into a golden nugget. Whereas doggies were bred to be puppylike forever.
Such adorable and understanding animals. It's not a mystery why dogs are so loved.
