>>8030046>2+2=5>actually, it equals 4>but 2+2=5>it equals 4>but 2+2=5...
gee, why would anyone ignore something that was already answered?
>>8028826NEVERMIND the fact that I was mocking that whole part about "popular things sell more, thus are higher quality" and you want a serious answer from that form of a question?
hue.