>>7873581>The "look it up yourself" defense. The go to argument when you can't supply evidence to back up your claimBurden of proof fallacy doesn't work that way. He's feigning ignorance to shit he himself said.
>durrr, i don't know what you're talking about, despite having said it two hours agoIt's like arguing with a 10 year old, but i guess that's why his standards are the same as little kids who bought these great TMNT figures because they loved the cartoon and don't care if they look like theyre from the cartoon or not.
Also, because they're fun to chew on.
And there's nothing wrong with liking to chew on toys and buying expensive collector toys based on pinata art that no one bought so they got clearanced out within months of release.
