>>7961527>That's because you're an idiot who prefers to shift the blame from the company to the user faggotNever happened, hamhands.
Calling someone a hamhands ≠ company did nothing wrong. Again, we have countless threads and posts in nearly every single general about how to fix stuck joints and issues with toys having them. Again, if this guy received his figure after people brought up the issues on catwoman, he's also a tard.
Stop lying just to excuse hamhands and retards.
>>7961513>The two faces in >>7959896 are incredibly similar.I love how you need to use this term " incredibly similar" just to give you an out because the fact remains that a difference like lenght/width is a very noticeable change. This is why people pay thousands of dollars for plastic surgery where even a few milimeters in a jawline will create a huge difference.
No doubt, your "out" will be "autism" or something else to deflect the fact that they failed at doing a good sculpt that captured her look. Again, they did a great job with Batman and Gwenpool, so seeing this is a major disappointment.
Again, you notice this these flaws yourself, hence your cherry picking images and saying its nitpicking to notice the differences in the art style.
So what's your next out to defend this disappointment?
