>>11019429>I assume it's licensedIt could be. But than why are they not using the original name of the line?
And it could be that the names were not trademarked. You know bootlegs or quick buck stuff dont apply for trademarks for everything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90JhVbzLVTk&list=PL3XCSTT5utps6zmRjb3t-HsWtZQ2oHm3q>$35Thats not that cheap.